nixuser has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
nixuser has joined #openwrt-devel
efahl has joined #openwrt-devel
Forst has quit [Quit: Quitting]
<Edu4rdSHL>
Hi, quick question. OpenWrt push several licenses on https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/tree/main/LICENSES, however, in the COPYING: OpenWrt is provided under: SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only ... In addition, other licenses may also apply. Is this possible to use OpenWrt on a company at all, without having to publish every thing you are going to modify/add? Or is that
<Edu4rdSHL>
simply not possible without breaking GPL
<Edu4rdSHL>
Thanks in advance
Forst has joined #openwrt-devel
<f00b4r0>
Edu4rdSHL: not sure if that answers your question but the GPL requires that the source be distributed along the binaries. In other words, any *recipient* of the binaries you build from GPL sources is entitled access to the (modified) sources.
<Habbie>
(and they are then allowed to put it online, to be clear)
<Edu4rdSHL>
f00b4r0, yeah, it seems that all needed is to just put the sources somewhere so that they can download it
<f00b4r0>
of course if said modifications are "internal use only", then the sources can remain "internal use" as well
<Habbie>
Edu4rdSHL, that is a valid implementation
<f00b4r0>
^
<Habbie>
but if you ship the binaries, they are not 'internal use'
<Edu4rdSHL>
Habbie, thanks, I thought it was going to be more complex!
eluks has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
eluks has joined #openwrt-devel
dermoth has joined #openwrt-devel
n3ph has joined #openwrt-devel
<f00b4r0>
is it expected that the GH packages CI will fail to download files for a brand new packages that isn't found on the owrt archive yet? It doesn't seem to try the git fallback, if I read the logs correctly
n3ph has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
danitool has joined #openwrt-devel
n3ph has joined #openwrt-devel
minimal has quit [Quit: Leaving]
n3ph_ has joined #openwrt-devel
n3ph has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Forst has quit [Quit: Quitting]
Forst has joined #openwrt-devel
sorinello has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Forst has quit [Quit: Quitting]
Forst has joined #openwrt-devel
n3ph_ has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
philipp64 has joined #openwrt-devel
<philipp64>
Can someone please review (and hopefully merge) my PR's for libubox? ISC-DHCP has gone end of life, and I'm trying to come up with a frontend for Kea that understands legacy /etc/config/dhcp files, but Kea of course uses JSON configs and synthesizing them from UCI is non-trivial. Also Kea doesn't seem to have an active maintainer, so I'd like to take it over... but as I've said on the mailing list, my libubox changes have not
<philipp64>
seen much progress in over a year. @jow reviewed them and I thought I addressed all of his comments, so they *should* be good to go unless I missed something.
<philipp64>
thanks BKpepe for the quick turn-around on the ssh permissions PR.
<philipp64>
in other news, since PC Engines is winding down, decided to go out and get a BPi-R4... there's a month lead time since it ships from China... don't know much about the MediaTek SoCs, so I'll ask here, the 4xGBE ports are they individual NICs, or connected to a switch internally?
<Habbie>
that feels like something the DTS could answer
efahl has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
n3ph has joined #openwrt-devel
<philipp64>
where is the magic about using env/kernel-config documented? I've not had to set up a new cloning in a really long time...
n3ph has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
<dwfreed>
philipp64: bpi-r4 uses a switch chip for the 1 GbE interfaces
<philipp64>
okay, so if I want to separate them, I need to put them on different VLAN's internally?
<dwfreed>
well, that depends; the switch chip is DSA, so if you want all 4 ports separate, just don't put them on 1 bridge
<dwfreed>
(the SFPs are their own interfaces direct to the CPU)
<dwfreed>
otherwise you can use separate bridges, or separate vlans on 1 bridge; tomato-tomahto
<dwfreed>
there is no real difference in practice
<slh>
just pointing out, Intel n100 or n97 based systems with four dedicated 2.5 GBit/s ports range from ~120-250 EUR on aliexpress, those would be almost a(n updated) 1:1 replacement for the apu2
<slh>
filogic 880 would be obviously much more interesting if wireless is part of the story (but at least in form of the BPi-R4, that is a tad too much on the may- or may not work side of things, and buying case, PSU, pigtails, antennas, wireless cards individually also drives up the cost quite a bit, especially if you can't be sure that it all works together)