09:42 <f00b4r0> nbd: probably silly question: is it expected that running 'tc filter dev <DEV> ingress protocol all prio 512' on a DEV that has an eBPF program attached (the one mentioned earlier) results in the ingress program being unloaded, even though 'tc filter show dev <DEV>' didn't show any active filter on the interface?

09:42 <f00b4r0> (trying to solve a clash between eBPF and bandwidth throttling)

09:47 <f00b4r0> s/unloaded/detached/

10:10 <f00b4r0> oh, tc filter show dev <DEV> ingress

10:11 <f00b4r0> i see. conflict of priority

11:20 <SwedeMike> https://carup.se/ny-lag-alla-svenskar-ska-fa-egen-laddare-till-elbil/ vore bra om man klargjorde att t ex samfälligheter nu explicit får (och eventuellt ska) hålla på med laddmöjligheter

11:21 <SwedeMike> oop

11:21 <SwedeMike> ECHAN

12:56 <hauke> efahl: We should do a 24.10.2 release

14:50 <f00b4r0> hauke: please make sure that mt76 gets updated then. It seems to finally fix a long standing issue with mt7915e radios

14:53 <f00b4r0> (would also be nice if #11650 could eventually be fixed because it's a real PITA, but sadly it doesn't look like it's going to happen)

14:56 <hauke[m]> f00b4r0: do you have a link to the commit fixing it?

14:57 <f00b4r0> hauke[m]: fixing what?

15:06 <enyc> hauke: Are you aware of the slab-leak parlaver (kernel side ram leaks related to hostapd and so-on)? I'm not sure has been properly bugreported that f00b4r0 nbd apparently know about?

15:10 <enyc> apparently client traffic related to an extent; apparently 24.10.0 and 24.10.1 affected, have a script checking for excess SUnreclaim and running wifi up when needed to keep it in check .........

15:10 <enyc> tried many wpad variants which does not seem to hep

15:15 <enyc> certainly affects iqp40xx/generic linksys-ea8300 with ath10k / ipq4019 style wifi

15:33 <owrt-images-builds> Build [#133](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/images/#/builders/116/builds/133) of `openwrt-24.10_bcm47xx/generic` failed: failed './scripts/feeds update' (failure)

18:33 <hauke> f00b4r0: you said that mt76 contains some important fixes in the main branch. What commit in mt76 is needed?

18:34 <hauke> enyc: I am not aware of the problem. If there is a fix in the main branch for the SUnreclaim problem I can cherry pick it

19:12 <f00b4r0> hauke: I'm not sure, better ask nbd, AIUI there are several commits

19:19 <schmars[m]> pretty sure the three latest commits, by blocktrron. that's the stuff from WCW

19:19 <schmars[m]> that would be https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/commit/372c2ea65612fc86039f441be16714df249cd063

19:47 <enyc> hauke: Alas not that I know about. It may be best I can do is re-test to see if 24.10.2 fixes-or-not. Some kernel patch/delta may be causing it, who knows!

21:24 <owrt-images-builds> Build [#134](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/images/#/builders/132/builds/134) of `openwrt-24.10_ath79/tiny` completed successfully.