00:53 <owrt-images-builds> Build [#169](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/images/#/builders/105/builds/169) of `main_apm821xx/nand` failed: failed './scripts/feeds update' (failure)

01:12 <owrt-images-builds> Build [#172](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/images/#/builders/67/builds/172) of `main_armsr/armv7` failed: failed './scripts/feeds update' (failure)

01:38 <owrt-images-builds> Build [#169](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/images/#/builders/53/builds/169) of `main_x86/generic` failed: failed Kmods built (failure)

02:33 <owrt-images-builds> Build [#150](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/images/#/builders/261/builds/150) of `main_qualcommax/ipq60xx` completed successfully.

05:47 <slh> russell--: the changes to make the initramfs image include all the DEVICE_PACKAGES/ support per device rootfs caused quite some additional build space requirements + additional time

06:07 <dhewg> nbd_: is there any plan to switch rpcd/luci over from libiwinfo to CONFIG_WIFI_SCRIPTS_UCODE?

07:00 <owrt-images-builds> Build [#101](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/images/#/builders/262/builds/101) of `openwrt-24.10_stm32/stm32mp1` completed successfully.

07:18 <owrt-images-builds> Build [#171](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/images/#/builders/61/builds/171) of `main_x86/geode` completed successfully.

08:44 <russell--> slh: is that considered an improvement?

08:45 <russell--> seems like quite a penalty for people bisecting problems

08:51 <robimarko> Its an improvement as initramfs images respect DEVICE_PACKAGES

08:51 <robimarko> Instead of just shipping the default package set when multiple profiles are selected

08:51 <robimarko> It allows dropping things like certain FS support from the default target package set

08:52 <robimarko> It just take longer to build if multiple profiles are used

08:56 <russell--> oh, that's not my case. i had a single target build from a dirclean, and (i don't have precise measurements, but ...) it seemed to take ~2x what it did a few months ago, but before i get too whiny, i should measure more systematically.

08:57 <robimarko> Yeah, that is not your issue then for sure

09:00 <russell--> what i'm remembering is my build box (16-core, E5-2680 @ 2.70GHz, 64GB of RAM) was taking somewhere in the 20-minute range, so i was first surprised by the 70 minute build, but even with the recent -O2 patch, it was still 40 minutes last night, which again *seemed* slower than usual.

09:01 <russell--> i'll shut up now, and measure

09:20 <robimarko> Yeah, start by finding out what is taking that long

12:25 <owrt-images-builds> Build [#27](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/images/#/builders/249/builds/27) of `openwrt-23.05_lantiq/xway_legacy` completed successfully.

14:55 <owrt-images-builds> Build [#28](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/images/#/builders/144/builds/28) of `openwrt-23.05_armsr/armv8` completed successfully.

15:09 <mirko> what to set PKG_LICENSE to for e.g. Qt, which is dual-licensed and/but also contains lot's of 3rd-party code it links (partially statically) against?

20:02 <owrt-images-builds> Build [#28](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/images/#/builders/148/builds/28) of `openwrt-23.05_mvebu/cortexa53` failed: failed Packages built (failure)

22:45 <digitalTARDIS> Hello, a user brought to my attention that the link to the factory install image on the ToH page https://openwrt.org/toh/tp-link/archer_c20_v1 is broken and instead points to a SysUpgrade image instead

22:46 <digitalTARDIS> I looked at the page and the syntax is correct and so is the short code. I am at a loss at how to fix it

23:41 <owrt-images-builds> Build [#168](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/images/#/builders/130/builds/168) of `main_mediatek/mt7623` failed: failed './scripts/feeds update' (failure)