ChanServ changed the topic of #wayland to: https://wayland.freedesktop.org | Discussion about the Wayland protocol and its implementations, plus libinput
feaneron has joined #wayland
Company has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Company has joined #wayland
kasper93_ has joined #wayland
kasper93 is now known as Guest16522
kasper93_ is now known as kasper93
Guest16522 has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
garnacho has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
alarumbe has quit []
fmuellner has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
feaneron has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
eroc1990 has joined #wayland
nerdopolis has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
nniro has joined #wayland
Brainium has quit []
feaneron has joined #wayland
eroc1990 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Company has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
dcz_ has joined #wayland
garnacho has joined #wayland
kts has joined #wayland
kts has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
rasterman has joined #wayland
Drakulix has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
kekekeks has joined #wayland
Drakulix has joined #wayland
leon-anavi has joined #wayland
iomari891 has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
iomari892 has joined #wayland
sima has joined #wayland
Drakulix has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Calandracas_ has joined #wayland
Calandracas has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<tokyo4j>
dcz_: is it intentional that the protocol is named input_method_experimental_v2 and manager interface is named xx_input_method_manager_v2, but IM interface is named xx_input_method_v1?
<emersion>
hwentlan_, pq: thoughts on intel's request for 32-but LUTs?
<emersion>
bit*
ramcq has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
rasterman has joined #wayland
karenw has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
mripard_ has quit []
<kekekeks>
Quick question: it's possible to "atomically" set a dispath queue when creating a proxy with new_id by using a wrapper for the factory object. Is it possible to atomically set _dispatcher_?
<kekekeks>
Right now there are two sort-of soft-contradicting requirements: 1) dispatcher has to be set while the new-object's owner thread/queue is not dispatching events 2) proxy wrapper has to be used while factory object's queue is not attempting to destroy wl_proxy
yshui_ has joined #wayland
<kekekeks>
I guess it's currently only valid to call object-returning methods from the thread that "owns" the queue designated for returned object
<kekekeks>
Is there something that would prevent adding an API for atomically setting a listener?
yshui_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
yshui has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
yshui has joined #wayland
Tom^ has joined #wayland
rasterman has quit [Quit: Gettin' stinky!]
<dwt>
I really need to have a thorough look through the colorops patches when I'm more awake. We have some weird stuff going on around LUTs. But I think it might be weird enough to just require a new op type anyway.
Tom^ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Tom^ has joined #wayland
feaneron has quit [Remote host closed the connection]