07:44 <wctrl[m]> anyone know what's the difference between MSM8930, MSM8630 and MSM8230? They seem to have same core amount and operate at the same frequency (see https://www.qualcomm.com/content/dam/qcomm-martech/dm-assets/documents/SD_Product_Brief.pdf)

08:20 <minecrell> wctrl[m]: LTE, unsure, 3g-only

08:20 <minecrell> It will be something like this

08:26 <wctrl[m]> ohh that makes sense, 8630 doesn't seem to have LTE either

22:00 <aka_[m]> konradybcio: stupid question but for sm6375/6115 shouldn't "default" pinctrl of i2c/spi reffer to "active" state from downstream and bias-disable on them instead of bias-pull-up(which is done on pinmux=func(gpio))

22:13 <konradybcio> please rephrase the question

22:13 <konradybcio> pull up on active makes sense, not so much on sleep

22:17 <aka_[m]> https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm-extra/devicetree/+/refs/heads/android-msm-bramble-4.19-android11-qpr1/qcom/bengal-pinctrl.dtsi#411

22:17 <aka_[m]> it looks it pulls pin up when pin takes state of gpio

22:19 <aka_[m]> elektroda/ti forums says spi doesn't require pull-up but i2c should

22:20 <aka_[m]> qcom has bias-disable in i2c examples even

22:20 <aka_[m]> https://docs.qualcomm.com/bundle/publicresource/topics/80-88500-1/42_Configure_I2C_in_kernel_.html

22:22 <aka_[m]> unless geni fw does it own thing

22:31 <aka_[m]> uh i don't get it much but it feels like bias-disable would be used when slave device contains it own pull-up resistors

22:32 <aka_[m]> 0 understanding in engineering so

22:33 <aka_[m]> ok "AI" stuff cannot explain shit

22:34 <aka_[m]> whatever will leave it as it is, tho spi should increase drive-strength to 6

22:39 <aka_[m]> seems bias-disable is set on some older socs like 8953